Revised Reference Values for the Intake of Protein

Following a timely update process, the nutrition societies of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (D-A-CH) revised the reference values for the intake of protein in 2017. The Working Group conducted a structured literature search in PubMed considering newly published papers (2000-2017).

Summary

For infants < 4 months, the estimated values were set based on the protein intake via breast milk. Reference values for infants >4 months, children, adolescents, pregnant, and lactating women were calculated using the factorial method considering both requirement for growth and maintenance. For adults, reference values were derived from nitrogen balance studies; for seniors (> 65 years), reports on metabolic and functional parameters under various protein intakes were additionally considered. Reference values (g protein/kg body weight per day) were set as follows: infants < 4 months: 2.5-1.4, children: 1.3-0.8, adults < 65 years: 0.8, adults >65 years: 1.0.

Key Messages

The reference values for infants, children, adolescents, and adults < 65 years are essentially unchanged compared to recently published values. Scientifically reliable data published between 2000 and 2017 guided the D-A-CH Working Group to set a higher estimated value for adults >65 years. Since the energy consumption continuously decreases with age, this new estimated protein intake value might be a challenge for the introduction of food-based nutrition concepts for older people.

Introduction

The D-A-CH “reference values for nutrient intake” [1] are jointly issued by the nutrition societies of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (the abbreviation D-A-CH arises from the initial letters of the common country identification: Germany [D], Austria [A], Switzerland [CH]) and are regularly revised according to a predefined protocol. Reference value is a collective term for recommended intake values, estimated values, and guiding values. A recommended intake value, according to its definition, meets the requirement of nearly any person (97.5%) of a defined group of metabolically healthy people. Estimated values are given when human requirements cannot be determined with desirable accuracy. Guiding values are stated in terms of aids to orientation [1].

Proteins, linear polymers of α-L-amino acids, are the dominant components of cell structures; about half of the dry weight of human cells is protein [2, 3]. Depending on age and gender, the human organism has an average protein content of approximately 7-13 kg [4, 5].

Endogenous protein is subject to constant formation and breakdown. Daily protein or amino acid turnover is approximately 300 g [6, 7], which is about 3-4 times greater than the mean intake in the general population [8]. Amino acids from exogenous sources (food) as well as from hydrolysis of endogenous proteins contribute to the intracellular amino acid pool [2, 9]. A quantitative breakdown of functional proteins (e.g., serum proteins, muscle proteins) to provide amino acids is associated with functional limitations [6].

Protein synthesis in the human body requires the intracellular availability of 20 different L-amino acids. Eleven of these so called “proteinogenic” amino acids can be endogenously synthesized in the human body (alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamine, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, serine, and tyrosine; referred to as dispensable [formerly: nonessential] amino acids). Nine amino acids (histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine; referred to as indispensable [formerly: essential] amino acids) require regular dietary intake. Except for lysine and threonine, metabolic needs for indispensable amino acids can also be covered through the intake of the corresponding keto acids, as they can be transaminated in the body to yield the respective amino acid [10]. The indispensability of histidine at present is only proven for infants [11]; whether this also applies to healthy adults needs still clarification [2, 12].

Depending on the number of amino groups in the amino acids, proteins have a characteristic percentage of nitrogen [2, 13, 14]. The nitrogen percentage of proteins in foods ranges from 15 to 24% [15]. For the calculation of the nitrogen content, a general nitrogen percentage of 16% is assumed. This results in a conversion factor of 6.25 g nitrogen per g protein. In addition to the elements forming the basic structure of proteins (carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen), they may also contain sulfur or selenium [2].

Strictly speaking, there is no requirement for protein, but for nitrogen and the 9 indispensable amino acids. Because protein is, indeed, the quantitatively most important source of nitrogen and amino acids in daily nutrition, reference values for daily protein intake were derived mainly for practical reasons. Since reference values are calculated on the basis of mean protein requirements adding a variation coefficient, it can be assumed that the requirements for all indispensable amino acids are covered by the consumption of mixed protein sources.

Following a timely update process, the D-A-CH reference values for protein and indispensable amino acids lastly published in 2000 [16] were revised and issued in German in September 2017 [1]. This paper summarizes the methodological concepts and most important results elaborated by the D-A-CH Protein Working Group.

Methods

Literature Research

The D-A-CH Working Group conducted a structured literature research in PubMed considering publications between 2000 and 2017. The research sought to identify all eligible English and German articles reporting results of original human studies, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews focusing on protein or amino acid requirements. The D-A-CH Protein Working Group selected the literature valid to be used for updating of the reference values for protein intake.

Data published on adult protein requirements were only included when measurements were performed using controlled human nitrogen balance studies; a linear relationship between nitrogen intake and nitrogen balance (linear model) was assumed. The minimum nitrogen intake that is sufficient to compensate the obligatory nitrogen losses (zero balance) was considered to meet the requirement. This minimum nitrogen intake was multiplied by a factor of 6.25 to receive protein quantities [17].

Derivation of Reference Values

The derivation of estimated values for protein intake for infants at the age of 0 to under 4 months is based on the nitrogen content in breast milk, which is considered to be the optimal diet for infants [18, 19]. The recommended protein intake for infants at the age of 4 months as well as for children and adolescents is derived by the factorial method using data from nitrogen balance studies in line with the approach of the WHO [12] and considered both, requirement for growth and maintenance. The recommended intake value for adults under 65 years of age is derived from the average requirement plus a 2-fold variation coefficient. Due to insufficient data for protein requirements based on balance studies in adults > 65 years, the working group decided to consider additionally reports on metabolic and functional parameters under various protein intakes to derive an estimated value. Due to methodological problems, data on protein requirements during pregnancy and lactation are not available. Consequently, the reference values for protein intake are derived following a factorial method: to the average protein requirement of nonpregnant women, additional amounts of protein needed for the maternal, and fetal protein deposition or for the milk production are considered.

Reference values for daily protein intake are presented in g/kg body weight and g, using the reference body weight for age and sex.

Results

Infants

A recent meta-analysis reported an average protein content in breast milk from mothers of term infants of 1.17 g/100 mL in the first month after birth and 1.0 g/100 mL in the second and third month after birth [20]. After correction for the nonprotein nitrogen (NPN, estimated to 25%), the average protein content in breast milk is 1.36 g/100 mL in the first month after birth and 1.17 g/100 mL in the second and third month after birth. Taking into account a daily average breast milk intake [21] of 600 mL/day (0 to under 1 month), 694 mL/day (1 to under 2 months) and 723 mL/day (2 to under 4 months), respectively [22], the protein intake in all 3 age groups is 8 g/day. In consideration of the reference body weights, the estimated reference values (g/kg body weight per day) for protein intake are 2.5 for infants at the age of 0 to under 1 month, 1.8 for infants at the age of 1 to under 2 months, and 1.4 for infants at the age of 2 to under 4 months (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). The reference value for infants at the age of 4 to under 12 months was derived by the factorial method (see children and adolescents).

Table 1

Recommended intake values for protein

a The information relates to normal weight; in case of overweight (body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m 2 in adults), the calculation should be based on normal body weight.

Children and Adolescents

Based on 7 studies, the WHO sets the maintenance requirement in infants/children between 9 months and 14 years to 110 mg N/kg body weight per day. As this value is nearly identical with the maintenance requirement in adults (105 mg N/kg body weight per day; see below), the WHO assumes the maintenance requirement in children to be the same as in adults (0.66 g protein/kg body weight per day; coefficient of variation 12%) [12]. The growth requirement is derived based on 2 studies on protein deposition during growth, a longitudinal study with children under 2 years of age [23], and a cross-sectional study with children at the age of 4-18 years [24]. After correction for the efficiency of protein turnover (58%) [12], an average requirement (sum of maintenance and growth requirement) of 1.12 g protein/kg body weight per day in infants at the age of 4 to under 12 months was calculated. The recommended intake is calculated from the average requirement plus twice the variation coefficient. In infants at the age of 4 to under 12 months, a reference value of 1.3 g/kg body weight per day was derived. Due to reduced growth rates, the average protein requirement continuously decreases with age (from 0.82 g/kg body weight per day at the age of 1 to under 4 years to 0.70 g/kg body weight per day [male] and 0.68 g/kg body weight [female] in adolescence). The recommended reference values calculated on the basis of the daily requirements are presented in Table ​ Table1 1 .

Adults under 65 Years of Age

As outlined under methods section, the derivation of the reference value for protein intake for adults is based on the results of nitrogen balance studies.

Two recent meta-analyses [17, 25] of nitrogen balance studies indicated an average nitrogen requirement in adults of 105 mg N/kg body weight per day corresponding to 0.66 g protein/kg body weight per day. Since data on gender-specific differences of protein requirements are inconsistent [17, 25, 26], no different values for women and men were derived.

Considering a coefficient of variation of 12% (addition of 24%) [17], the recommended protein intake for men and women is 0.8 g protein/kg body weight per day corresponding to a recommended daily protein intake of 55-57 g protein for men and 47-48 g protein for women, respectively (Table ​ (Table1 1 ).

Adults 65 Years of Age and Older

Two meta-analyses of nitrogen balance studies [17, 26] compared the nitrogen requirement of younger (≤55 or < 60 years) and older people (>55 or ≥60 years). Differences in nitrogen requirement were reported but did not reach statistic significance. The authors calculated an average requirement of 0.66 g protein/kg body weight per day in metabolically healthy older as well as in younger and middle-aged adults. Two nitrogen balance studies in older persons (55-70 years [27], 77-99 years [28]) not considered in the meta-analyses due to methodological limitations (no younger control group) indicate that the protein requirement may be slightly higher in older adults.

Metabolic studies indicate a reduced muscle protein synthesis in older age (≥60 vs. 18-31 years [29], 72 ± 2 vs. 25 ± 1 years [30], 60-74 vs. 19-38 years [31]). Experimental metabolic tests showed that older subjects (~71 vs. ~22 years [32], 68 ± 2 vs. 31 ± 2 years [33]) require larger quantities of amino acids for maximum muscle protein synthesis.

In a systematic review, the results of clinical studies on the influence of a single protein or amino acid administration on muscle protein synthesis in younger and older people are summarized (middle-aged persons ≥55 vs. 18-35 years). Eight of 21 studies showed significant differences between younger and older adults regarding the effects of protein or amino acid administration on muscle protein synthesis. The other 13 studies did not indicate a difference between younger and older subjects [34].

In one of the studies, older participants (~71 years) required 0.4 g protein/kg body weight for maximum stimulation of muscle protein synthesis, while in younger adults (~22 years), 0.24 g protein/kg body weight was sufficient [32]. This observation is explained by anabolic resistance [35, 36, 37, 38], which implies that in older people, the production of endogenous proteins from dietary proteins is impaired, probably (among other reasons) due to reduced postprandial amino acid availability and decreased muscle blood flow [39, 40, 41, 42].

Several prospective cohort studies [43, 44, 45] and a cross-sectional study [46] showed an association between protein intake and physical functionality or functional course, respectively. Subjects with a higher protein intake were compared with subjects with a lower average protein intake (≥0.8 vs. 0.81-1.19 vs. ≥1.2 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 65-72 years [43]; approximately 0.8 g/kg body weight/day vs. approximately 1.2 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: ≥60 years [44]; 1.0 vs. 1.2 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 50-79 years [45]; 0.8-1.19 vs. ≥1.2 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 50-75 years [46]). Subjects with a higher protein intake showed better functional parameters regarding strength and mobility [43, 44, 45, 46]. Over an observation period of several years, they also had a lower loss of specific function parameters (e.g., grip strength) [43-45]. However, after adjustment for fat mass, this was partially no longer statistically significant [43].

A higher protein intake compared with a lower protein intake in older adults (1.2 vs. ≥0.8 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 65-72 years [47]; 1.6 vs. 0.8 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 75 ± 3 years [48]; 1.3 vs. 0.9 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 67-84 years [49]; 1.2 vs. 0.8 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 70-79 years [50]) was also associated with greater fat-free mass or muscle mass, respectively, and partially with a lower loss [50] or even an increase [47, 48] of fat-free mass, body cell mass or muscle mass, respectively, over a period of several years. Data from the NuAge study showed a significant difference in men in fat-free body mass between the quartiles of protein intake at baseline (quartile 1: 0.86 g/kg body weight/day, quartile 4: 1.29 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 67-84 years) but no effect of protein intake on the loss of fat-free mass over 2 years. A cross-sectional study did not show any difference in muscle mass in subjects with higher protein intake compared with subjects with lower protein intake (≥1.2 vs. 0.8-1.19 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 50-75 years) [46].

Two prospective cohort studies showed a lower incidence of frailty or a reduced risk of frailty, respectively, at higher compared with lower protein intake over a period of about 3 years (quartile 1: men 31.6-82.9 g/day, women 26.9-68.0 g/day, quartile 4: men 115.8-218.4 g/day, women 95.7-181.3 g/day, age of the subjects: ≥60 years [51]; 1.2 vs. 1.0 g/kg body weight/day, age of the subjects: 65-79 years [52]).

Considering the results mentioned above, an estimated value is set at 1.0 g/kg body weight per day for both women and men above 65 years. In relation to reference body weight, the estimated value for adequate protein intake is 57 g/day for women and 67 g/day for men (Table ​ (Table1 1 ).

Pregnancy

According to the WHO [53, 54], a body weight gain of 10-14 kg (mean 12 kg) is associated with optimal health of mother and fetus. With a body weight gain of 12 kg until birth of the child, 597 g protein is deposited [53, 55]. Body weight gain and protein deposition during pregnancy are not linear. Protein deposition distribution is approximately 1.3 g protein/day (20%) in the second trimester and 5.1 g protein/day (80%) in the third trimester. Body weight gain occurs to approximately 11% in the first, 47% in the second, and 42% in the third trimester [55]. To derive the protein requirement for protein deposition, it has to be corrected by the efficiency of protein turnover. For pregnant women, the efficiency of protein turnover is assumed to be the same as for nonpregnant women (47%) [56]. The protein requirement for the body weight gain during pregnancy, in relation to the average body weight gain in each trimester, has then to be added. For the first trimester, an additional protein intake of 0.4 g per day was calculated; considering the recommended protein intake for women at the age of 19 to under 25 years of 48 g/day, this amount can be neglected (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). For the second and third trimester of pregnancy, average additional protein requirements are considerably higher (5.5 g protein/day and 17.1 g protein/day, respectively). Consequently, considering a coefficient of variation of 12% (addition of 24%), the recommended additional protein intakes calculated to 7 and 21 g protein/day in the second and third trimester, respectively (Table ​ (Table1 1 ).

To determine the recommended daily protein intake per kg body weight, the protein requirement for protein deposition is divided by total body weight. The total body weight is calculated from the average weight gain in each trimester and the reference body weight for women at the age of 19 to under 25 years. The resulting average additional protein requirement during pregnancy plus the protein requirement for nonpregnant women correspond to the average protein requirement for pregnant women. Thus, considering a coefficient of variation of 12% (addition of 24%), the recommended protein intake is 0.9 g protein/kg body weight/day in the second trimester and 1.0 g protein/kg body weight/day in the third trimester (Table ​ (Table1 1 ).

Lactation

The protein content of human breast milk in various lactation periods was presented in detail above; in mature breast milk the average protein content is approximately 1.0 g/100 mL [20]. After correction for the NPN, the average protein content in breast milk is 1.17 g/100 mL in the first 3 months after birth. Assuming an average milk intake of the suckling of 750 mL/day, approximately 8.8 g protein/day is secreted [21]. Considering an efficiency of protein turnover similar to nonlactating women (47%) [56], the average additional protein requirement in lactating women is 18.6 g/day corresponding to an additional protein intake of 23 g/day (CV 12%). Based on the reference weight for women at the age of 19 to under 25 years, this corresponds to a recommended intake value of 1.2 g/kg body weight per day (0.8 g/kg body weight plus additional 0.4 g/kg body weight; Table ​ Table1 1 ).

Discussion

Per definition, D-A-CH reference values for nutrients are used to plan health-maintaining diets and to evaluate actual nutrient intakes of healthy people [1]. Per definition, intakes according to reference values cover nutrient requirements in 97.5% of the population; thus, risks for symptoms of nutrient deprivation and associated metabolic disorders are minimized. In general, the recommended reference value for adults is derived from the average nutrient requirement plus a coefficient of variation. This surplus should ensure that a protein intake following the recommendations should provide all indispensable amino acids in sufficient quantities independent of the specific biological value of the protein mixture consumed individually, at least when considering typical dietary patterns and food choices in developed countries.

Obviously, the scientific reliability of the reference values strictly depends on the confidential assessment of the respective average requirements. In accordance with the strategy of other international Nutrition Societies [12, 56], the Working Group decided to use age- and sex-specific protein requirements only when they were determined in controlled nitrogen balance studies. Within the last years, the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) method was proposed as an alternative, probably more precise technology to estimate the protein requirements [57, 58]. Until today, the IAAO method has been only occasionally used to determine protein requirement in children [59], young adults [60-62], older people [63, 64], and pregnant women [65]. Compared to earlier data from nitrogen balance studies, protein requirements assessed with IAAO tend to be generally higher (+15-73%). Due to limited date, final conclusions with respect to the “true” values are currently not possible; initial discussions about the true value are controversial [66-68].

Due to the lack of age-specific data, derivation of D-A-CH reference values lastly published in 2000 could not reliably consider distinct age groups in adulthood [16]. Reliable knowledge of adult protein requirements is still poor today; however, numerous recent human studies focusing on functional and/or metabolic outcomes strongly suggest that adults > 65 years may benefit from a protein intake higher than 0.8 g/kg body weight/day as recommended for adults aged 18-65 years [43-52]. Consequently, the Working Group decided to consider these current data in addition to results of nitrogen balance studies and to define an estimated value of 1.0 g/kg body weight/day for older adults (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). This is in line with the statements of the PROT-AGE Study Group [39], the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [40], and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis [69] recommending a protein intake of 1.0-1.2 g/kg body weight per day for adults above 65 years of age [39, 40] or between 50 and 70 years [69] to maintain functional integrity. In contrast, the EFSA [56], the IOM [70], and the WHO [12] do not recommend other protein intake quantities for older adults (≥60 years [56], ≥51 years [70]) than for younger adults.

The calculation of D-A-CH reference values consider age- and sex-dependent reference body weights and are also valid in physically active adults (30 min 4-5 times a week) [71-73]. Whether increased physical activities (strengths/resistance training) or even competitive sports (athletes) may lead to a considerable higher protein demand is still under debate. Presently, a newly installed D-A-CH Working Group on Sports Nutrition is dealing with that topic and will publish specific recommendations in due time.

As outlined above, reference values are scientifically valid for healthy subjects; disease-specific alterations in protein/amino acid metabolism are not taken into account. Nevertheless, reference values for healthy subjects are frequently used to establish dietetic concepts in clinical nutrition by simply adding a surcharge to cover a potential higher requirement. Indeed, higher protein/amino acid demands are assumed in various diseases; reliable data are, however, not available. The protein reference values do also not consider potential preventive effects of protein consumption.

Conclusion

The present revision of the D-A-CH reference values lastly published in 2000 in the light of newly data published has led to one important change: a specific estimated value for adults > 65 years has been set. Since the energy consumption continuously decreases with age, this new estimated protein intake value might be a challenge for the introduction of food-based nutrition concepts for older adults. The process for the derivation of reference values for pregnant and lactating women is now specified in detail; reference values for infants, children, adolescents, and adults < 65 years are essentially unchanged.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Dr. Sabine Ellinger, Birte Peterson-Sperlich, Dr. Daniela Strohm, and Professor Dr. Bernhard Watzl for their valuable suggestions and contribution to the preparation of the revised reference values for protein intake.

Ethics Statement

The authors have no ethical conflicts to disclose.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare, except J. Bauer who received fees for his institution from several entities (Fresenius, Nestlé, Nutricia Danone, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer) during the 36 months prior to this publication and H. Heseker who is member of the alpro foundation supporting research projects and junior researchers in the field of plant-based nutrition.

Funding Sources

The authors have no funding conflicts to declare.

Author Contributions

P.S. and M.R.: conducted the literature research and drafted the manuscript. K.B., J.M.B., I.E., H.H., E.L.-B., G.S., and D.V.: revised the draft critically. All authors contributed to the conception of the manuscript and interpreted the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernärung, Österreichische Gesellschaft für Ernärung, Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ernärung (eds) Referenzwerte für die Närstoffzufuhr. 2017 revised. Bonn. [Google Scholar]

2. Matthews DE, Proteins and amino acids . Modern nutrition in health and disease. In: Ross AC, Caballero B, Cousins RJ, Tucker KL, Ziegler TR, editors. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. pp. pp. 3–35. [Google Scholar]

3. Tome D. Criteria and markers for protein quality assessment - a review. Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug; 108 ((S2 Suppl 2)):S222–S229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Wang Z, Shen W, Kotler DP, Heshka S, Wielopolski L, Aloia JF, et al. Total body protein: a new cellular level mass and distribution prediction model. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Nov; 78 ((5)):979–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Cohn SH, Vartsky D, Yasumura S, Sawitsky A, Zanzi I, Vaswani A, et al. Compartmental body composition based on total-body nitrogen, potassium and calcium. Am J Physiol. 1980 Dec; 239 ((6)):E524–E530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Tomé D, Bos C. Dietary protein and nitrogen utilization. J Nutr. 2000 Jul; 130 ((7)):1868S–73S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Waterlow JC. Whole-body protein turnover in humans—past, present and future. Annu Rev Nutr. 1995; 15 ((1)):57–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Krems C, Walter C, Heuer T, Hoffmann I, Lebensmittelverzehr und Närstoffzufuhr - Ergebnisse der Nationalen Verzehrsstudie II . Ernärungsbericht 2012. Bonn. 2012. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernärung (ed): 12; pp. pp 40–85. [Google Scholar]

9. Liu Z, Barrett EJ. Human protein metabolism: its measurement and regulation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Dec; 283 ((6)):E1105–E1112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Reeds PJ. Dispensable and indispensable amino acids for humans. J Nutr. 2000 Jul; 130 ((7)):1835S–40S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Snyderman SE, Boyer A, Roitman E, Holt LE Jr, Prose PH. The histidine requirement of the infant. Pediatrics. 1963 May; 31 :786–801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. WHO. (World Health Organization) Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition: Report of a joint WHO/FAO/UNU expert consultation. WHO technical report series. Genf. 2007; Vol. 935 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Wu G. Amino acids: metabolism functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids. 2009 May; 37 ((1)):1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Bischoff R, Schlüter H. Amino acids: chemistry functionality and selected non-enzymatic post-translational modifications. J Proteomics. 2012 Apr; 75 ((8)):2275–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Souci SW, Fachmann W, Kraut H, editors. 8th ed. revised. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2016. Food composition and nutrition tables: Die Zusammensetzung der Lebensmittel - Närwert-Tabellen La composition des aliments - Tableaux des valeurs nutritives. [Google Scholar]

16. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernärung, Österreichische Gesellschaft für Ernärung, Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ernärung, Schweizerische Vereinigung für Ernärung., editors. Frankfurt/M: Umschau Verlag; 2000. Referenzwerte für die Närstoffzufuhr. [Google Scholar]

17. Rand WM, Pellett PL, Young VR. Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Jan; 77 ((1)):109–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Butte NF, Lopez-Alarcon MG, Garza C. Nutrient adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding for the term infant during the first six months of life WHO (World Health Organization), 2002. [cited 2019 Feb 4] Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42519/9241562110.pdf?sequence=1. [Google Scholar]

19. Bührer C, Genzel-Boroviczény O, Jochum F, Kauth T, Kersting M, Koletzko B, et al. Ernärung gesunder Säuglinge. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 2014; 162 :527–38. [Google Scholar]

20. Gidrewicz DA, Fenton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the nutrient content of preterm and term breast milk. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Aug; 14 ((1)):216. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Neville MC, Keller R, Seacat J, Lutes V, Neifert M, Casey C, et al. Studies in human lactation: milk volumes in lactating women during the onset of lactation and full lactation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Dec; 48 ((6)):1375–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Wu ZC, Chijang CC, Lau BH, Hwang B, Sugawara M, Idota T. Crude protein content and amino acid composition in Taiwanese human milk. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2000 Oct; 46 ((5)):246–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Butte NF. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in pregnancy: normal compared with gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 May; 71 ((5 Suppl)):1256S–61S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Ellis KJ, Shypailo RJ, Abrams SA, Wong WW. The reference child and adolescent models of body composition. A contemporary comparison. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 May; 904 ((1)):374–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Li M, Sun F, Piao JH, Yang XG. Protein requirements in healthy adults: a meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies. Biomed Environ Sci. 2014 Aug; 27 ((8)):606–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Campbell WW, Johnson CA, McCabe GP, Carnell NS. Dietary protein requirements of younger and older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Nov; 88 ((5)):1322–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Campbell WW, Trappe TA, Wolfe RR, Evans WJ. The recommended dietary allowance for protein may not be adequate for older people to maintain skeletal muscle. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Jun; 56 ((6)):M373–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Gersovitz M, Motil K, Munro HN, Scrimshaw NS, Young VR. Human protein requirements: assessment of the adequacy of the current Recommended Dietary Allowance for dietary protein in elderly men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Jan; 35 ((1)):6–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Henderson GC, Dhatariya K, Ford GC, Klaus KA, Basu R, Rizza RA, et al. Higher muscle protein synthesis in women than men across the lifespan and failure of androgen administration to amend age-related decrements. FASEB J. 2009 Feb; 23 ((2)):631–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Guillet C, Prod—homme M, Balage M, Gachon P, Giraudet C, Morin L, et al. Impaired anabolic response of muscle protein synthesis is associated with S6K1 dysregulation in elderly humans. FASEB J. 2004 Oct; 18 ((13)):1586–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Short KR, Vittone JL, Bigelow ML, Proctor DN, Nair KS. Age and aerobic exercise training effects on whole body and muscle protein metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jan; 286 (1):E92–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Moore DR, Churchward-Venne TA, Witard O, Breen L, Burd NA, Tipton KD, et al. Protein ingestion to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis requires greater relative protein intakes in healthy older versus younger men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Jan; 70 ((1)):57–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Katsanos CS, Kobayashi H, Sheffield-Moore M, Aarsland A, Wolfe RR. Aging is associated with diminished accretion of muscle proteins after the ingestion of a small bolus of essential amino acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Nov; 82 ((5)):1065–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Shad BJ, Thompson JL, Breen L. Does the muscle protein synthetic response to exercise and amino acid-based nutrition diminish with advancing age? A systematic review. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Nov; 311 (5):E803–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Witard OC, Wardle SL, Macnaughton LS, Hodgson AB, Tipton KD. Protein considerations for optimising skeletal muscle mass in healthy young and older adults. Nutrients. 2016 Mar; 8 ((4)):181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Landi F, Calvani R, Tosato M, Martone AM, Ortolani E, Savera G, et al. Protein intake and muscle health in old age: from biological plausibility to clinical evidence. Nutrients. 2016 May; 8 ((5)):295. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Moore DR. Keeping older muscle “young” through dietary protein and physical activity. Adv Nutr. 2014 Sep; 5 ((5)):599S–607S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Burd NA, Gorissen SH, van Loon LJ. Anabolic resistance of muscle protein synthesis with aging. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013 Jul; 41 ((3)):169–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, Cesari M, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Morley JE, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position ­paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Aug; 14 ((8)):542–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Deutz NE, Bauer JM, Barazzoni R, Biolo G, Boirie Y, Bosy-Westphal A, et al. Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clin Nutr. 2014 Dec; 33 ((6)):929–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Layman DK, Anthony TG, Rasmussen BB, Adams SH, Lynch CJ, Brinkworth GD, et al. Defining meal requirements for protein to optimize metabolic roles of amino acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Jun; 101 ((6 Suppl)):1330S–8S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. Paddon-Jones D, Short KR, Campbell WW, Volpi E, Wolfe RR. Role of dietary protein in the sarcopenia of aging. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 May; 87 ((5)):1562S–6S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Isanejad M, Mursu J, Sirola J, Kröger H, Rikkonen T, Tuppurainen M, et al. Dietary protein intake is associated with better physical function and muscle strength among elderly women. Br J Nutr. 2016 Apr; 115 ((7)):1281–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. McLean RR, Mangano KM, Hannan MT, Kiel DP, Sahni S. Dietary protein intake is protective against loss of grip strength among older adults in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Mar; 71 ((3)):356–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Beasley JM, Wertheim BC, LaCroix AZ, Prentice RL, Neuhouser ML, Tinker LF, et al. Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and physical function in the Women—s Health Initiative. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Nov; 61 ((11)):1863–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

46. Lemieux FC, Filion ME, Barbat-Artigas S, Karelis AD, Aubertin-Leheudre M. Relationship between different protein intake recommendations with muscle mass and muscle strength. Climacteric. 2014 Jun; 17 ((3)):294–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. Isanejad M, Mursu J, Sirola J, Kröger H, Rikkonen T, Tuppurainen M, et al. Association of protein intake with the change of lean mass among elderly women: The Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention - Fracture Prevention Study (OSTPRE-FPS) J Nutr Sci. 2015 Dec; 4 :e41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

48. Meng X, Zhu K, Devine A, Kerr DA, Binns CW, Prince RL. A 5-year cohort study of the effects of high protein intake on lean mass and BMC in elderly postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Nov; 24 ((11)):1827–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Farsijani S, Morais JA, Payette H, Gaudreau P, Shatenstein B, Gray-Donald K, et al. Relation between mealtime distribution of protein intake and lean mass loss in free-living older adults of the NuAge study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Sep; 104 ((3)):694–703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

50. Houston DK, Nicklas BJ, Ding J, Harris TB, Tylavsky FA, Newman AB, et al.Health ABC Study Dietary protein intake is associated with lean mass change in older, community-dwelling adults: the Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jan; 87 ((1)):150–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

51. Sandoval-Insausti H, Pérez-Tasigchana RF, López-García E, García-Esquinas E, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Guallar-Castillón P. Macronutrients intake and incident frailty in older adults: a prospective cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Oct; 71 ((10)):1329–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

52. Beasley JM, LaCroix AZ, Neuhouser ML, Huang Y, Tinker L, Woods N, et al. Protein intake and incident frailty in the Women—s Health Initiative observational study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jun; 58 ((6)):1063–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

53. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) WHO (World Health Organization), UNU (Unites Nations University), editors. Human energy requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series. Rom. 2004; Vol. 1 [Google Scholar]

54. WHO. (World Health Organization) Maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes. A WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ. 1995; 73 (Suppl):1–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Butte NF, King JC. Energy requirements during pregnancy and lactation. Public Health Nutr. 2005 Oct; 8 ((7a 7A)):1010–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

56. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for protein. EFSA J. 2012; 10 ((2)):2557. [Google Scholar]

57. Pencharz PB, Protein and amino acids . Present knowledge in nutrition. In: Erdman JW, MacDonald IA, Zeisel SH, editors. 10th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. pp. pp. 69–82. [Google Scholar]

58. Elango R, Ball RO, Pencharz PB. Recent advances in determining protein and amino acid requirements in humans. Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug; 108 (S2 Suppl 2):S22–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

59. Elango R, Humayun MA, Ball RO, Pencharz PB. Protein requirement of healthy school-age children determined by the indicator amino acid oxidation method. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Dec; 94 ((6)):1545–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

60. Humayun MA, Elango R, Ball RO, Pencharz PB. Reevaluation of the protein requirement in young men with the indicator amino acid oxidation technique. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct; 86 ((4)):995–1002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

61. Li M, Wang ZL, Gou LY, Li WD, Tian Y, Hu YC, et al. Evaluation of the protein requirement in Chinese young adults using the indicator amino acid oxidation technique. Biomed Environ Sci. 2013 Aug; 26 ((8)):655–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

62. Tian Y, Liu J, Zhang Y, Piao J, Gou L, Tian Y, et al. Examination of Chinese habitual dietary protein requirements of Chinese young female adults by indicator amino acid method. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2011; 20 ((3)):390–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

63. Tang M, McCabe GP, Elango R, Pencharz PB, Ball RO, Campbell WW. Assessment of protein requirement in octogenarian women with use of the indicator amino acid oxidation technique. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Apr; 99 ((4)):891–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

64. Rafii M, Chapman K, Owens J, Elango R, Campbell WW, Ball RO, et al. Dietary protein requirement of female adults []65 years determined by the indicator amino acid oxidation technique is higher than current recommendations. J Nutr. 2015 Jan; 145 ((1)):18–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

65. Stephens TV, Payne M, Ball RO, Pencharz PB, Elango R. Protein requirements of healthy pregnant women during early and late gestation are higher than current recommendations. J Nutr. 2015 Jan; 145 ((1)):73–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

66. Hoffer LJ. Protein requirement of school-age children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Mar; 95 ((3)):777. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

67. Marini JC. Protein requirements: are we ready for new recommendations? J Nutr. 2015 Jan; 145 ((1)):5–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

68. Millward DJ, Jackson AA. Protein requirements and the indicator amino acid oxidation method. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jun; 95 ((6)):1498–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

69. Rizzoli R, Stevenson JC, Bauer JM, van Loon LJ, Walrand S, Kanis JA, et al.ESCEO Task Force The role of dietary protein and vitamin D in maintaining musculoskeletal health in postmenopausal women: a consensus statement from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) Maturitas. 2014 Sep; 79 ((1)):122–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

70. IOM (Institute of Medicine), editor . Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2005. Dietary reference intakes for energy carbohydrate, fiber fat, fatty acids, cholesterol protein and amino acids. [Google Scholar]

71. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernärung: Stellungnahme des DGE-Arbeitskreises "Sport und Ernärung" . DGEinfo. 2001. Proteine und Kohlenhydrate im Breitensport; pp. 67–69. [Google Scholar]

72. Lamont LS. A critical review of recommendations to increase dietary protein requirements in the habitually active. Nutr Res Rev. 2012 Jun; 25 ((1)):142–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

73. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority): Scientific and technical assistance on food intended for sportspeople EFSA Supporting publication. 2015 EN-871. [Google Scholar]